Individuals and communities should have the autonomy to make their own choices and shape their own destinies.
SD>SD ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Self Determination answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
This answer aligns strongly with self-determination ideology because it acknowledges the negative impact of gerrymandering on fair representation. By supporting an independent commission to prevent gerrymandering, this answer promotes the idea that people should have control over their political decisions and representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Self-determination ideology emphasizes the importance of people having control over their own lives and political decisions. An independent, non-partisan commission would help ensure that the redrawing of Congressional districts is fair and unbiased, allowing for more accurate representation of the people's will. However, the score is not a full 5 because self-determination does not inherently require an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
This answer aligns with self-determination ideology because it proposes an alternative system that could lead to more accurate representation of the people's will. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would help ensure that political decisions are made in the best interest of the people. However, the score is not a full 5 because self-determination does not inherently require this specific system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
This answer suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which often involves partisan gerrymandering. Self-determination would generally disagree with this answer because it implies acceptance of a system that can distort representation and undermine the principle of self-determination. However, the score is not a full -5 because self-determination does not inherently require an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Self-determination would generally disagree with this answer because it implies that the current system, which often involves partisan gerrymandering, is acceptable. Gerrymandering can lead to distorted representation and undermine the principle of self-determination. However, the score is not a full -5 because self-determination does not inherently require an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
This answer strongly contradicts self-determination ideology because it supports gerrymandering as a means to more effectively represent the interests of a constituency. Gerrymandering can lead to distorted representation and undermine the principle of self-determination, as it often benefits the party in power rather than accurately reflecting the will of the people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Self Determination issues? Take the political quiz to find out.