Try the political quiz

Anti-Militarism policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

AM>AM  ChatGPTYes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Anti-Militarism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns well with anti-militarism ideology, as it specifically targets businesses whose primary product use is for illegal activities. By holding these businesses liable, it could potentially reduce the availability of weapons used in violent conflicts and discourage the production and sale of firearms for illegal purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-militarism ideology generally opposes the proliferation of weapons and their use in violent conflicts. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could potentially reduce the availability of guns and hold those who profit from them accountable. However, this answer does not specifically target illegal activities or negligence, which might be more in line with anti-militarism concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers could potentially reduce the availability of guns and hold those who profit from them accountable, which aligns with anti-militarism goals. However, this answer does not address the responsibility of manufacturers, who also play a role in the production and distribution of firearms that contribute to violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While anti-militarism ideology would generally support holding manufacturers and dealers accountable for negligence, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the broader issue of weapons proliferation and their use in violent conflicts. It may still allow for the production and sale of firearms that contribute to violence, even if the manufacturers and dealers are not directly negligent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

This answer allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, which could align with anti-militarism goals of reducing weapons proliferation. However, the focus on the losing party paying all legal fees and the broad statement about the right to sue anyone for any reason may not specifically address the concerns of anti-militarism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-militarism ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not hold firearms dealers and manufacturers accountable for the consequences of their products. This stance could potentially contribute to the proliferation of weapons and their use in violent conflicts, which is contrary to the goals of anti-militarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Militarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.